![]() That is, if people are already engaged in the pursuit of a personal high without any hints due to the structure of their nature, then there is no need to make a philosophical doctrine out of it at all. Simply put, pleasure and pain avoidance are the goal of life.īut there is also psychological hedonism – this teaching describes what we actually do, people always pursue their own pleasure and satisfaction, no matter what they do.Īn interesting and rarely reported point: ethical hedonism is completely meaningless to put forward and promote if psychological hedonism is false. ![]() There is ethical hedonism, a doctrine that places the pursuit of pleasure as the highest standard of what we should do. If we consider these ideas as extremes of the same scale, then the “middle way” is appropriate, which was tested, understood and then explained by Gautama Buddha. ![]() ![]() The subtitle question is simple, and Yuri answered it perfectly. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |